|
We specialize in litigation of accident related injury cases. Mr. Azizi is regularly involved in litigating serious-catastrophic injury cases which result in favorable settlements and verdicts. The following represent some of settlements and jury verdicts by our trial lawyer. This list does not represent all of the settlements and jury verdicts but is provided as an illustration of some of the results obtained by our trial lawyer.
dangerous condition of public road - no median barrier on freeway
This case involved a tragic incident wherein the majority of the family members lost
their lives as a result of a head on collision due to lack of a median barrier on the highway in question.
read more
school district liability - lack of proper supervision
This action involved tragic incident wherein Plaintiff a minor, suffered catastrophic
brain injuries while playing in a high school football game.
read more
on-the-job forklift injury resulting in paraplegia
This case involved in incident wherein the Plaintiff suffered an on the job injury while in the course and scope of his employment. At the time of the incident, Plaintiff had only worked for his employer for 1 ½ weeks. His job was to operate a forklift to unload crates from trailers. Plaintiff had approximately 9 years experience working with forklifts loading and unloading products.
read more
wrongful death - freeway accident
This action involved a wrongful death of 54 year old male survived by his wife and
four (4) adult children. At approximately 3:00 a.m., on January 10, 2005, decedent was
driving a 2001 Ford F-150 pick-up truck eastbound on the I-60 Freeway. It was raining
heavy off and on all night. While traveling eastbound decedent’s vehicle spun out of
control and collided with the center divider. The decedent’s vehicle came to rest extending
sideways across the center median and into the number one lane.
read more
brain injury - truck freeway accident
This action involved a multiple vehicle accident wherein Plaintiffs’ car was crushed
in between Defendant’s big-rigs and a pick up truck. At the time of the accident, Plaintiffs
were completely stopped in traffic, when Defendant’s employee, rear ended Plaintiffs’
vehicle and pushed their car into the pick up truck in front of them. Defendant’s employee
admitted that instead of applying his brakes and downshifting, he believed that he could
downshift only to stop his big-rig.
read more
head on freeway collision - accident
This action involved a tragic incident wherein on July 10, 2001, Defendant truck
driver was driving an a semi-truck in the course and scope of his employment delivering
beer. Defendant truck driver became distracted by a bee that flew in the window of the
truck. While trying to kill the bee with a check guarantee stamper Defendant truck driver
crossed over the center divider of state route 74 and struck the vehicle in which, Plaintiff
was a passenger. The impact was head-on at approximately 50 mph. As a result of the
incident, Plaintiff sustained severe injuries.
read more
dangerous flammable hula skirt causing severe 3rd degree burns
This action involved a tragic incident wherein Plaintiff sustained 3rd degree severe
burn injuries because Defendant manufacturer knowingly sold a hula skirt to Plaintiff that
was not made from suitable fabric and possessed extraordinary characteristics of
flammability.
read more
auto accident causing permanent injuries
This action involved a car vs truck accident wherein Plaintiff was eastbound on
Eighth Street, in the City of Los Angeles when Defendant a delivery driver within the course
and scope of his employment, negotiated a left turn mid block in front of Plaintiff’s
automobile. The accident required Plaintiff to wear a leg length cast. While wearing the
cast Plaintiff slipped and fell and re-injured her leg. On the first day of trial Defendants
admitted fault for the collision, but disputed the nature, extent and severity of Plaintiff’s
injuries and damages and disputed causation for the injuries caused as a result of the fall.
read more
dangerous electrical sign
This action involved a tragic wrongful death incident, wherein Plaintiff’s husband
got electrocuted as a result of coming in contact with a defective/improperly installed sign
mounted on the outside wall of Defendant’s property, located in Pacoima, California. The
subject sign emitted and/or leaked a high voltage of electricity.
read more
defective product - seat back failure
Plaintiff was rendered a quadriplegic as a result of a seat back failure involving a
vehicle manufactured and designed by Defendant.
read more
pedestrian vs mta bus accident
This action involved a tragic accident wherein Defendant, MTA’s employee
negligently made a left turn and struck Plaintiff while she was walking within the cross-walk,
on a “walk” sign...
read more
wrongful death - mta bus accident vs pedestrian
This action involved a tragic wrongful death accident wherein Defendant, MTA’s
employee driver negligently made a right turn and ran over decedent while she was walking
within the cross-walk, on a “walk” sign, at the intersection of First Street and Broadway in
the City of Los Angeles.
read more
pedestrian vs mta bus accideent resulting in amputation
This action involved a tragic wrongful death accident wherein Defendant, MTA’s
employee driver negligently made a right turn and ran over decedent while she was walking
within the cross-walk, on a “walk” sign, at the intersection of First Street and Broadway in
the City of Los Angeles.
read more
train v. truck accideent requiring back surgery
This action involved a tragic incident wherein Plaintiff sustained severe injuries
requiring back surgery as a result of the negligence and reckless conduct of Defendant
truck driver.
read more
trip and fall accident
This action involved a trip and fall incident wherein Plaintiff was visiting her friend
who resided in a house owned by Defendants. Upon leaving Defendant’s premises,
Plaintiff walked down 3 stairs and as she stepped off the bottom stair Plaintiff stepped on
a garden hose and fell.
read more
* Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances. Because every case is different, the descriptions of awards and cases previously handled are not meant to be a guarantee of success.
|
